Return-Path: <liora@lioramanne.com>
Delivered-To: stephen@transocean.com
Received: from vps.transocean.com
	by vps.transocean.com with LMTP id qN68NDowrFpMFgAAInt2oQ
	for <stephen@transocean.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:59:38 -0700
Return-path: <liora@lioramanne.com>
Envelope-to: stephen@transocean.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:59:38 -0700
Received: from p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([68.178.252.107]:50062)
	by vps.transocean.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89_1)
	(envelope-from <liora@lioramanne.com>)
	id 1ewwRl-0001i8-1L
	for stephen@transocean.com; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:59:38 -0700
Received: from transoceansmbp.home ([71.167.45.222])
	by :SMTPAUTH: with SMTP
	id wwR4eW4YfiQ2xwwR5eeM2R; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:58:48 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Coco -  Three dogs - I need your vote
From: Liora Manne <liora@lioramanne.com>
In-Reply-To: <048f01d3bd68$e4d85e70$ae891b50$@transocean.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:03:52 -0400
Cc: Dean Smith <dean@transocean.com>,
 Charley Peck <charley@transocean.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <516F99B0-48AD-44E4-B70F-43AFA5D11C9B@lioramanne.com>
References: <EF04A852-865A-4BEB-9ACB-B34C7F7BAA1F@lioramanne.com> <5E6A9C3F-3032-43CA-B0F6-165BCD1C8728@lioramanne.com> <048f01d3bd68$e4d85e70$ae891b50$@transocean.com>
To: stephen@transocean.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOLxe3vnP6v980bVQlx7ylrVFcejG6px9dsbU7yd8u7k8zLlCbFWe3OySOhYZ3nodcy/bB8PTnIOgmt6TP4sy0+LdZGzlxDavIM0Wk12FM9E1O1k/Xae
 m6gNt3+QnfT9m722iLmKd7fd3FtYbL0rTrL/By/ZF4d0FzAo3DCJKUoH0xJ8rWLzK7/r5GkFJgdML+khEZ8FwsMj4Ltuq3QEJmMgP8n4die6IuJBtWKusNtb
 bUgneohY1npSpNcv9vxLqQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.9
X-Spam-Score: -1008
X-Spam-Bar: ---------------------------------------------------
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 
 Content preview:  So should we make both samples and have one for a special
   customer? Or just the Sit Stay which is unique and have the art of the Welcome
    for the likes of HG or Tuesday morning? On Mar 16, 2018, at 4:53 PM, <stephen@transocean.com>
    <stephen@transocean.com> wrote: [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-100.9 points, 3.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: transocean.com]
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
                             anti-forgery methods
X-Spam-Flag: NO

So should we make both samples and have one for a special customer? =20
Or just the Sit Stay which is unique and have the art of the Welcome for =
the likes of HG or Tuesday morning?


On Mar 16, 2018, at 4:53 PM, <stephen@transocean.com> =
<stephen@transocean.com> wrote:

> I like the Sit/Stay idea but the simple "Welcome" is always best.
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liora Manne <liora@lioramanne.com>=20
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:50 PM
> To: Dean Smith <dean@transocean.com>; Stephen Hoberman
> <stephen@transocean.com>; Charley Peck <charley@transocean.com>
> Subject: Coco - Three dogs - I need your vote
>=20
> There are 3 versions -=20
> Can you tell which one or two you think we should make?
>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20

