Return-Path: Delivered-To: diana@transocean.com Received: from vps.transocean.com by vps.transocean.com with LMTP id ELNvNimca1q9XAAAInt2oQ for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:22:49 -0800 Return-path: Envelope-to: diana@transocean.com Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:22:49 -0800 Received: from resources.applnw.com ([198.23.221.201]:61811) by vps.transocean.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1efBSM-0006Cd-4g for diana@transocean.com; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:22:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1 Reply-To: forbes.wellness@applnw.com Message-ID: <48Lu.fL9ghlUN.5ajarLH0Ust7@resources.applnw.com> To: diana@transocean.com From: Forbes Wellness Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4coZ2e3U.qoLiXzFxD8w.uNpdhuIm7se8n" Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:22:42 -0500 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.6 X-Spam-Score: 36 X-Spam-Bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Jan 26, 2018 STUDENTS AND BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS REJOICE Students are rejoicing in 2018 about a new substitue for Adderall. Seen on Shark Tank last week, this episode had more views than any other episode in history. Do you know anyone using these yet or have you tried it? [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: applnw.com] 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Spam-Flag: YES Subject: ****SPAM**** Alternative method being used by students to keep focus --4coZ2e3U.qoLiXzFxD8w.uNpdhuIm7se8n Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Jan 26, 2018 STUDENTS AND BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS REJOICE Students are rejoicing in 2018 about a new substitue for Adderall. Seen on Shark Tank last week, this episode had more views than any other episode in history. Do you know anyone using these yet or have you tried it? Read More: http://forbes/top/today/085607 (http://djsa.applnw.com/ojashd8usa9) http://djsa.applnw.com/ojashd8usa9 ============================================================ with reality. They earn millions, of course they'd think a 600$ juicer is definitely not overpriced. It's the kinda shit that Silicon Valley the show makes fun of, and then you realise shit like this actually happens in Silicon Valley the Silicon Valley. The people selling the juicer were selling it as the next Kurig cup but for juice. The VC's got so hard with the idea that people would be spending gobs of money in the coming future for juice from a pouch that they blew their loads all over that startup idea. Besides, many of these VC firms will throw $10M at anything in the hopes that 1 in 20 of their investments is a huge payoff. What a wasteful POS. As if a barcode can tell you if the pouch of pulp say in 90F sun for 48 hours before being put back in the fridge. If I'm one of those VC guys I'd resign immediately and leave the field. The whole thing was reverse engineering to be pitched to investors. It hit all of the key points. Recurring revenue from existing customers, trending (juicing is a trend), low cost manufacturing, the owner has experience in the. ** [RT:6744] (http://dhja.applnw.com/0dajshdua8uappZ5giPl9llqfSjon7DHuhEmfnogUHrPGnJOS6e%2FBRZjjM%2FHXZ84J6ih%2B8vxxsbYEKjoYk0ZXuttwCUb%2FOQNxLTg%3D%3Dlnw) applying different standards in dealing with carbon emissions vs energy generation. Apply the same per-population standards to both, or apply the same total emissions/total energy standards to both. Let's pick one standard and. room with 20 people and an amber alert going off on several phones at once. the system means well, but it?s very very flawed. :(. --4coZ2e3U.qoLiXzFxD8w.uNpdhuIm7se8n Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Jan 26, 2018

Students and Business Professionals Rejoice

Students are rejoicing in 2018 about a new substitue for Adderall. Seen on Shark Tank last week, this episode had more views than any other episode in history. Do you know anyone using these yet or have you tried it?

Read More: http://forbes/top/today/085607


with reality. They earn millions, of course they'd think a 600$ juicer is definitely not overpriced. It's the kinda shit that Silicon Valley the show makes fun of, and then you realise shit like this actually happens in Silicon Valley the Silicon Valley. The people selling the juicer were selling it as the next Kurig cup but for juice. The VC's got so hard with the idea that people would be spending gobs of money in the coming future for juice from a pouch that they blew their loads all over that startup idea. Besides, many of these VC firms will throw $10M at anything in the hopes that 1 in 20 of their investments is a huge payoff. What a wasteful POS. As if a barcode can tell you if the pouch of pulp say in 90F sun for 48 hours before being put back in the fridge. If I'm one of those VC guys I'd resign immediately and leave the field. The whole thing was reverse engineering to be pitched to investors. It hit all of the key points. Recurring revenue from existing customers, trending (juicing is a trend), low cost manufacturing, the owner has experience in the.







RT:6744

applying different standards in dealing with carbon emissions vs energy generation. Apply the same per-population standards to both, or apply the same total emissions/total energy standards to both. Let's pick one standard and.

room with 20 people and an amber alert going off on several phones at once. the system means well, but it?s very very flawed. :(.

--4coZ2e3U.qoLiXzFxD8w.uNpdhuIm7se8n--