Return-Path: Delivered-To: diana@transocean.com Received: from vps.transocean.com by vps.transocean.com (Dovecot) with LMTP id aRX9IJGB1FgzWgAAInt2oQ for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:16:49 -0700 Return-path: Envelope-to: diana@transocean.com Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:16:49 -0700 Received: from [67.21.78.148] (port=60886 helo=alfalsafa.com) by vps.transocean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from ) id 1crEmV-0006BA-Lb for diana@transocean.com; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:16:49 -0700 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 22:06:47 -0400 Mime-Version: 1 Message-ID: <7535367880efcab8c324536e0c838e3bE3rBMumAJGbV2QWwzNF@imap.alfalsafa.com> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 To: diana@transocean.com Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit From: Peter Kim Reply-To: peter.kim@alfalsafa.com X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.1 X-Spam-Score: 41 X-Spam-Bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Medigap It's because it's easier and, in a weird way, more immediately rewarding to read about/plan about/obsess about fitness than it is to actually practice it. I'll blow 45 minutes at work reading around and getting exact answers as to which shoulder press variation I should be ding, then stay up too late that night killing my gains and I don't even make it into the gym the next day. People love to make this ideal, impossible plan and let great become the enemy of good. 40% of total calories from protein far exceeds and recommendation with empirical backing. 1.2-1.8g/kg has been show sufficient for a training athlete. Even if we bump that up to 2-2.2g/kg, that is no where near 40% total calories. Second, food quality does not matter in terms of loss. While it is healthier to eat nutrient dense food, your loss will not be anymore effective if your deficit stays the same. Third, The best way to burn from your abs is by training your legs with consistency and intensity. That is simply not true. You cannot spot reduce. Overall the article was too wishy washy for me. Author should have taken a clear stance against IMO.Macronutrient intake + size of deficit determines loss/muscle retention. You will still lose 1 lb a week eating 500 calorie deficit with nutrient dense vs non nutrient dense food. Micronutrients do effect one's overall health and therefore ability to make gains, but that role is extremely small compared to calories and macros. Unless you are deficient, it is a moot point. Ultimately calories/macros will play an astronomically larger role for a majority of trainees. The line about losing belly was directly quoted from the article. As I said spot loss isn't possible, regardless of the intention it is inaccurate and misleading. My protocols are based on empirical evidence. Just because some get results using arbitrary dieting methods doesn't mean they are just as good. People lose doing broscience diets such as paleo, zone, etc and still lose weight. Does that mean they are equivalent to research backed [...] Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 DIET_1 BODY: Lose Weight Spam 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: alfalsafa.com] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Spam-Flag: YES Subject: ****SPAM**** Understand your Medicare options in a confusing landscape. Medigap
View message in browser

 
 


you can end messages at this site

It's because it's easier and, in a weird way, more immediately rewarding to read about/plan about/obsess about fitness than it is to actually practice it. I'll blow 45 minutes at work reading around and getting exact answers as to which shoulder press variation I should be ding, then stay up too late that night killing my gains and I don't even make it into the gym the next day. People love to make this ideal, impossible plan and let great become the enemy of good. 40% of total calories from protein far exceeds and recommendation with empirical backing. 1.2-1.8g/kg has been show sufficient for a training athlete. Even if we bump that up to 2-2.2g/kg, that is no where near 40% total calories. Second, food quality does not matter in terms of loss. While it is healthier to eat nutrient dense food, your loss will not be anymore effective if your deficit stays the same. Third, The best way to burn from your abs is by training your legs with consistency and intensity. That is simply not true. You cannot spot reduce. Overall the article was too wishy washy for me. Author should have taken a clear stance against IMO.Macronutrient intake + size of deficit determines loss/muscle retention. You will still lose 1 lb a week eating 500 calorie deficit with nutrient dense vs non nutrient dense food. Micronutrients do effect one's overall health and therefore ability to make gains, but that role is extremely small compared to calories and macros. Unless you are deficient, it is a moot point. Ultimately calories/macros will play an astronomically larger role for a majority of trainees. The line about losing belly was directly quoted from the article. As I said spot loss isn't possible, regardless of the intention it is inaccurate and misleading.
 
 
My protocols are based on empirical evidence. Just because some get results using arbitrary dieting methods doesn't mean they are just as good. People lose doing broscience diets such as paleo, zone, etc and still lose weight. Does that mean they are equivalent to research backed protocols? No