Return-Path: Delivered-To: diana@transocean.com Received: from vps.transocean.com by vps.transocean.com (Dovecot) with LMTP id EUhnIrIkt1gaPwAAInt2oQ for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:44:50 -0800 Return-path: Envelope-to: diana@transocean.com Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:44:50 -0800 Received: from [46.166.191.214] (port=51038 helo=ktofilm.com) by vps.transocean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAB1-0004kj-Sc for diana@transocean.com; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:44:50 -0800 Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:35:29 -0500 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1 Message-ID: Reply-To: marcus.howell@ktofilm.com To: diana@transocean.com Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 From: Marcus Howell X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.2 X-Spam-Score: 42 X-Spam-Bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Your Numerology Report Are You Ready To Meet Your True Self? Tap Into the 4,000 Year Old Science of Numerological Analysis With a Free Numerology Video Report! Get Your Numerology Report Today → [...] Content analysis details: (4.2 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ktofilm.com] 0.0 DIET_1 BODY: Lose Weight Spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5994] 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image 0.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML To: lacks brackets and no rDNS and HTML only X-Spam-Flag: YES Subject: ****SPAM**** Your numerological analysis awaits. Find out why certain things are happening to you. Your Numerology Report

Are You Ready To Meet Your True Self?
Tap Into the 4,000 Year Old Science of Numerological Analysis With a Free Numerology Video Report!

Get Your Numerology Report Today →












see here for options changes

But I???ve gotten rid of things I loved. I???ve not bought things I loved. I???ve not worn things I love. I don???t think I???ve ever bought something I didn???t love. So, it can???t be that we should just all buy what we love, or else we???d buy everything. We can love a lot of things, it doesn???t mean we should own them all. How, then, do you find the intersection of love and practicality in a thing? How do you decide that something you love is practical enough to fit into your everyday life, and that you should therefore add it to your wardrobe? And then, how do you decide when something isn???t practical at all, but brings such a smile to your face, and ???sparks joy*??? in your heart that you should buy it or keep it anyway? Is there a formula? (no, I don???t think there is a formula, but there is a process, and a way to find balance) What does love mean, anyway, when you???re referring to a thing? How do you measure it? by how it makes you feel? by how it makes you look? both? If you were like me after losing weight, everything looked good on my new body, I felt great in everything, and therefore???you got it, I bought everything. Where is all of that now? Most of it is gone. I did love those things, once, and I think they served their purpose : they taught me that I don???t NEED to buy that fits, or that looks good on me. Which meant I could happily get rid of them. But assuming you???re trying to keep a small-ish wardrobe, and avoid the overwhelming feeling of having too much ??? how do you avoid buying everything you love going forward? Honestly, I???m not really sure ??? I???m still learning my way around this one, but I think the key lies in finding the intersection between