Return-Path: Delivered-To: diana@transocean.com Received: from vps.transocean.com by vps.transocean.com (Dovecot) with LMTP id 2+F4FjRMZVjpTwAAInt2oQ for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:47:32 -0800 Return-path: Envelope-to: diana@transocean.com Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:47:32 -0800 Received: from [192.161.62.60] (port=47921 helo=wafafashion.com) by vps.transocean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cMenR-0005JO-W3 for diana@transocean.com; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:47:32 -0800 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:37:33 -0500 To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2erkT7535367880efcab8c324536e0c838e3b9aBiN" Reply-To: "Chris Knight" From: "Chris Knight" Subject: Macy's Lovers! We have 100 Dollars to get you into to our overstock clearance! Message-Id: <90944.7535367880efcab8c324536e0c838e3b@17818229securemail.wafafashion.com> Mime-Version: 1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.7 X-Spam-Score: 47 X-Spam-Bar: ++++ X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: xzczczxzc I feel the need to point out that the if inside a for you mention is not only pretty much functionally equivalent to the other examples but would also probably be faster in a lot of cases. Also for someone who claims to like functional style, what you're promoting seems to go against functional programming's dearly beloved concept of purity since DoStuff clearly has side effcets. ??? Pharap Jul 15 at 22:02 49 I've never really understood why people link combining all the logic onto a single line makes it look somehow better or more readable. Your C++ snippet at the very top is by far the most readable to me out of all of your possibilities. And since efficiency won't be changed, I cannot understand why you would prefer not to write that, unless you are being paid by number of lines of code that you delete. ??? Cody Gray Jul 16 at 1:02 9 @CodyGray Agreed: it' just syntactic sugar. And the question title is misleading, because it is very different avoiding branching and hiding it under abstraction. ??? black Jul 16 at 9:06 Macy's Year End Blowout [...] Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: macysassets.com] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: wafafashion.com] 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Spam-Flag: NO --2erkT7535367880efcab8c324536e0c838e3b9aBiN Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit xzczczxzc I feel the need to point out that the if inside a for you mention is not only pretty much functionally equivalent to the other examples but would also probably be faster in a lot of cases. Also for someone who claims to like functional style, what you're promoting seems to go against functional programming's dearly beloved concept of purity since DoStuff clearly has side effcets. ??? Pharap Jul 15 at 22:02 49 I've never really understood why people link combining all the logic onto a single line makes it look somehow better or more readable. Your C++ snippet at the very top is by far the most readable to me out of all of your possibilities. And since efficiency won't be changed, I cannot understand why you would prefer not to write that, unless you are being paid by number of lines of code that you delete. ??? Cody Gray Jul 16 at 1:02 9 @CodyGray Agreed: it' just syntactic sugar. And the question title is misleading, because it is very different avoiding branching and hiding it under abstraction. ??? black Jul 16 at 9:06 Macy's Year End Blowout 50 eGiftCardd to use at Macy's (LAST DAY) The end of the year is near. We'e closing out 2016 with rewards for you! All you need to do is let us know about some items you already use. Begin here to claim your eCard? (http://www.wafafashion.com/m-macys/) http://www.wafafashion.com/card/ Sincerely, eRewards # ?? 2016 Field Net, 5859 E. elmwood, Meas, AZ 85205 You can cease-all communications using this URL (http://non.wafafashion.com/) or by writing. ** National Happenings ------------------------------------------------------------ TODAY! Macy's Santaland Presents Dickens Village Dec 27 - Dec 31 Philadelphia, PA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17043) TODAY! Macy's Christmas Light Show ------------------------------------------------------------ Dec 27 - Dec 31 Philadelphia, PA DEC 31 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Dec 31 El Paso, TX (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17438) JAN 2 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 2 Ponce, PR JAN 3 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Jan 3 Houston, TX (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17443) JAN 4 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 4 El Paso, TX JAN 4 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Jan 4 Pasadena, TX (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17441) JAN 4 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 4 McAllen, TX JAN 4 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Jan 4 San Antonio, TX (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17446) JAN 5 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 5 Laredo, TX JAN 5 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Jan 5 San Juan, PR (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17434) JAN 5 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 5 Hialeah, FL JAN 5 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Jan 5 The Woodlands, TX (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17440) JAN 5 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 5 San Antonio, TX JAN 6 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's Jan 6 Jersey City, NJ (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17452) JAN 6 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 6 Elmhurst, NY JAN 7 Celebrate 3 Kings Day at Macy's! Jan 7 Bakersfield, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17424) JAN 7 Celebrates 3 Kings Day at Macy's! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 7 Victorville, CA JAN 7 New Year, New You Jan 7 New York, NY (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17568) JAN 12 Celebrate a New Year & New You with Cassey Ho! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 12 San Francisco, CA JAN 14 Swim Fashion Show and Shopping Party! Jan 14 Minnetonka, MN (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17590) JAN 14 Cooking Demo with Kaiser Permanente's Chef Linda Shiue, MD ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 14 San Francisco, CA JAN 14 Celebrate a New Year & New You at Macy's Roseville! Jan 14 Roseville, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17487) JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 21 Glendale, CA JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! Jan 21 Los Angeles, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17545) JAN 21 I Do...What's Next ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 21 Miami, FL JAN 21 Health & Wellness Event! Jan 21 Las Vegas, NV (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17490) JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 21 Palm Desert, CA JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! Jan 21 Costa Mesa, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17491) JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 21 Sherman Oaks, CA JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! Jan 21 Pasadena, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17494) JAN 21 Get Red Carpet Ready! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 21 Los Angeles, CA JAN 21 Red Carpet Dress Shopping Party Jan 21 Manhattan Beach, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17498) JAN 25 Cooking with Green Gables Cafe ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 25 Miami, FL JAN 28 Health & Wellness Event Jan 28 Columbus, OH (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17488) JAN 28 Celebrate Lunar New Year with Macy's! ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 28 Honolulu, HI JAN 28 Celebrate Lunar New Year at Macy's! Jan 28 Costa Mesa, CA (http://social.macys.com/eventshub/event?id=17460) JAN 28 Celebrate National Slow Cooker Month ------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 28 New York, NY --2erkT7535367880efcab8c324536e0c838e3b9aBiN Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Your Macy's e-Card
xzczczxzc
I feel the need to point out that the if inside a for you mention is not only pretty much functionally equivalent to the other examples but would also probably be faster in a lot of cases. Also for someone who claims to like functional style, what you're promoting seems to go against functional programming's dearly beloved concept of purity since DoStuff clearly has side effcets. ??? Pharap Jul 15 at 22:02 49 I've never really understood why people link combining all the logic onto a single line makes it look somehow better or more readable. Your C++ snippet at the very top is by far the most readable to me out of all of your possibilities. And since efficiency won't be changed, I cannot understand why you would prefer not to write that, unless you are being paid by number of lines of code that you delete. ??? Cody Gray Jul 16 at 1:02 9 @CodyGray Agreed: it' just syntactic sugar. And the question title is misleading, because it is very different avoiding branching and hiding it under abstraction. ??? black Jul 16 at 9:06
 
 

$50 eGiftCardd to use at Macy's (LAST DAY)

The end of the year is near. We'e closing out 2016 with rewards for you! All you need to do is let us know about some items you already use.

Begin here to claim your eCard→

Macy's eCard (End of year)

Sincerely,

eRewards
 
 
                                                                 
--2erkT7535367880efcab8c324536e0c838e3b9aBiN--