Return-Path: Received: from vps.transocean.com by vps.transocean.com with LMTP id 2OLyAeVwv1pcZgAAInt2oQ ; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 04:28:37 -0700 Return-path: Envelope-to: cs@transocean.com Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 04:28:37 -0700 Received: from mail.corporate-courses.com ([66.96.202.32]:50402) by vps.transocean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f2EgQ-0006tW-R3 for cs@transocean.com; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 04:28:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Project Delay Management" Reply-To: serene@corporate-courses.com To: cs@transocean.com Subject: Project Delay Management & Claim Assessment Masterclass Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_7500_604F33EF.13985372" Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 19:05:02 +0800 Message-ID: <31604016511762766731634@VM-YEESING> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 X-Spam-Score: 8 X-Spam-Bar: / X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Project Delay Management & Claim Assessment Masterclass 2 – 3 April 2018 , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 6 – 7 May 2018 , Dubai ,UAE [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: transocean.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4999] X-Spam-Flag: NO ------=_NextPart_001_7500_604F33EF.13985372 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Project Delay Management & Claim Assessment Masterclass 2 =96 3 April 2018 , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 6 =96 7 May 2018 , Dubai ,UAE To request brochure, please reply with subject code =91PD-C=92 or contact += 65 6825 9551 . =20 Delay and disruption claims are both commonplace on construction projects. = As projects become increasingly large and complex, we see clients passing o= n as much risk as possible to the head contractor; risks that a contractor = may find difficult to manage and/or costly in terms of time and money shoul= d they eventuate. It is hardly surprising that when critical path activitie= s are delayed or disrupted as a result of labour, scheduling, site and/or c= onstruction issues, disputes arise over who (client or contractor) should b= ear the additional costs incurred as a result. =20 They can be caused by external factors, identified risk events or by the ac= tions or inactions of the project team and project supply chain. Regardless= of the source of delay, it is of everyone=92s interest to effectively mana= ge the consequences of the delay and then apportion liability quickly and f= airly. Inflated claims, the blame-game and other destructive tactics played= out years after the project was eventually finished rarely benefit anyone = other than the claims experts and lawyers involved in the dispute. =20 To unsubscribe, reply with subject =91 Unsub-C cs@transocean.com =20 ------=_NextPart_001_7500_604F33EF.13985372 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Project Delay = Management & Claim Assessment Masterclass<=3Fxml:namespace prefix =3D o= ns =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

2 =96 3 April 20= 18 , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

6 =96 7 May 2018 , Dubai ,UAE

T= o request brochure, please reply with subject code =91PD-C=92 or contact +65 6825 955= 1 .

Delay and disruption c= laims are both commonplace on construction projects. As projects become inc= reasingly large and complex, we see clients passing on as much risk as poss= ible to the head contractor; risks that a contractor may find difficult to = manage and/or costly in terms of time and money should they eventuate. It i= s hardly surprising that when critical path activities are delayed or disru= pted as a result of labour, scheduling, site and/or construction issues, di= sputes arise over who (client or contractor) should bear the additional cos= ts incurred as a result.

They can be caused by = external factors, identified risk events or by the actions or inactions of = the project team and project supply chain. Regardless of the source of dela= y, it is of everyone=92s interest to effectively manage the consequences of= the delay and then apportion liability quickly and fairly. Inflated claims= , the blame-game and other destructive tactics played out years after the p= roject was eventually finished rarely benefit anyone other than the claims = experts and lawyers involved in the dispute.

<= /B>

To unsubscribe, reply with subject =91 Unsub-C cs@transocean.com
<= /SPAN>

------=_NextPart_001_7500_604F33EF.13985372--