Return-Path: <bounces+1121182-8175-bruce=transocean.com@mailings-q.law360.com>
Received: from vps.transocean.com
	by vps.transocean.com with LMTP id mO3HB8QaWVpRbwAAInt2oQ
	; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:29:56 -0800
Return-path: <bounces+1121182-8175-bruce=transocean.com@mailings-q.law360.com>
Envelope-to: bruce@transocean.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:29:56 -0800
Received: from o4.mailings-q.law360.com ([167.89.1.233]:39705)
	by vps.transocean.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128)
	(Exim 4.89_1)
	(envelope-from <bounces+1121182-8175-bruce=transocean.com@mailings-q.law360.com>)
	id 1ea5xT-0007UI-Nv
	for bruce@transocean.com; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:29:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=law360.com; 
	h=from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; 
	s=s1; bh=Ks4/l9bRnjWz61Ew74GqiOBqJoo=; b=HgHQS5QB/zF02UMhirSCBXo
	GIzUuNvuXxX+2ctTGOuaEGgnRL9NdLdRVfNqL8jTZo8teJKDjno8dLjfmfW9Bwgv
	SrGozPLYTg18H7WSnbDi2M3W27gp4dZ9JzmNMq/ihJ9n9z+WBx1NoQvq4OQNQPzT
	dJ1skqWE9BtB0VoIUytA=
Received: by filter0300p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0300p1las1-25154-5A591A92-3
        2018-01-12 20:29:06.336511265 +0000 UTC
Received: from www.law360.com (ec2-52-23-238-65.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.23.238.65])
	by ismtpd0006p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Uf0eUynGRlWpwtkFgOooFg
	for <bruce@transocean.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:29:06.146 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Tax Law360 <news-q@law360.com>
To: bruce@transocean.com
Message-ID: <5a591a921f406_12d72b29ef3f6f589677d5@ip-172-30-200-31.mail>
Subject: BREAKING: Justices Will Review Rail Stock-Options Tax Case
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SG-EID: Opio7iv9VGQ4tDJiJszIh3zd7qYkeM6M7FLocQY/BAWEIL4MeszIMeUidnrh11vT7U95hiR2umPG9l
 91hOJjt+6OvMFNs7IDgGLOV84bovyj3XJup/8gPiFFiddBk7xfo78mRsFlPrDtI6c+Q50UF+lMcHFE
 3YWspNWwk1rt2SGniy0GCKxFMQ+3MwjgAN5U37acVg4WGsV2tTU7EjjFVQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8
X-Spam-Score: 8
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 
 Content preview:  The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it will review a Seventh
    Circuit decision that found income from $13.3 million in stock options that
    were given to employees of a Canadian railroad company was taxable compensation.
    TAX [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 3.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: law360.com]
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
                             background
  0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
 -0.0 BAYES_20               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
                             [score: 0.1515]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
  0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY          Huge... sums of money
X-Spam-Flag: NO

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
	<head>
		<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />


		<style type="text/css">
		<!--
			a, a:link, a:visited {color: #004A8F; text-decoration:none;}
			a:hover {color: #004A8F; text-decoration:underline;}
		-->
		</style>
	</head>
	<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#004A8F" vlink="#004A8F" alink="#0180C6">
		<center>
			<style>
@media only screen and (max-device-width: 480px) {
	body {
		font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif;
	}
	.desktop {display:none; display:none !important}
	.mobile {
		display:block !important; 
		overflow:visible !important;
	  	float: none !important;
		width: auto !important;
		height: auto !important;
	}
	table.root {
		width: 100%;
	}
	a {
		text-decoration: none;
		color: #00357E;
	}
}
</style>
<div style="font-size: 1px; color: #ffffff; display: none !important; mso-hide:all;">
		The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it will review a Seventh Circuit decision that found income from $13.3 million in stock options that were given to employees of a Canadian railroad company was taxable compensation.
</div>
<table class="root" width="750" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
	<tr valign="top">
			<td width="130" align="left" style="padding-left:5px; font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif; font-size:17px; color: #BD000D"><a href="https://www.law360.com/tax?nl_pk=0418e859-ed1f-40ac-9fca-fb4ddee2a32d&utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=tax">
				<img src="https://www.law360.com/images/Law360-ln-nl.png" alt="Law360 Tax" width="158" height="75" border="0" />
			</a></td>
		<td valign="middle" style="margin:0; font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif; font-size:17px; text-align:left; padding-right: 15px"><a href="https://www.law360.com/tax?nl_pk=0418e859-ed1f-40ac-9fca-fb4ddee2a32d&utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=tax" style="text-decoration: none; color: #BD000D">TAX</a></td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td colspan="2" style="padding-left:5px; font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif; font-size:14px; font-weight: bold; text-align:left; padding-right: 15px">
			<hr size="1" noshade="noshade"/>
			<table width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
				<tr>
					<td>Friday, January 12, 2018</td>
					<td style="text-align:right;">
						<a href="https://twitter.com/TaxLaw360"><img src="https://www.law360.com/images/twitter-follow.png" alt="Follow Tax Law360" /></a>
					</td>
				</tr>
			</table>
			<hr size="1" noshade="noshade"/>
		</td>
	</tr>
</table>
<table class="root" width="750" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="text-align:left; padding-top: 10px">
	<tr>
		<td style="padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 15px; text-align: left" valign="top">
				<p style="margin:0; font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif; font-size:16px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif">
					<a href="https://www.law360.com/tax/articles/1001798/breaking-justices-will-review-rail-stock-options-tax-case?nl_pk=0418e859-ed1f-40ac-9fca-fb4ddee2a32d&utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=tax" style="text-decoration: none; color: #00357E">BREAKING: Justices Will Review Rail Stock-Options Tax Case</a>
				</p>
				<p style="margin:2px 0 15px 0; font-family: Arial, Sans-Serif; font-size:14px">The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it will review a Seventh Circuit decision that found income from $13.3 million in stock options that were given to employees of a Canadian railroad company was taxable compensation.</p>
		</td>
		<td class="desktop" valign="top" style="border-left: 1px solid black" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
			<table width="215" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellPadding="0" style="text-align:left; margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px">
				<tr>
					<td>
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr><td>&nbsp;</td></tr>
			</table>
			<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 0px">&nbsp;</p>
		</td>
	</tr>
</table>
<br/>
<!--[if !mso 9]><!-->
<div class="mobile" style="display:none; width:0; height:0; float:left; overflow:hidden">
	<table class="mobile" style="display:none; width:0; height:0; float:left; overflow:hidden" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="text-align:left; margin-left: 8px">
		<tr>
			<td valign="top">
				<hr size="1" noshade="noshade" />
	            <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
	            </table>
		    </td>
	    </tr>
	</table>
</div>
<!--<![endif]-->
<img src="https://www.law360.com/pixel?nl_pk=0418e859-ed1f-40ac-9fca-fb4ddee2a32d&utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=tax" width="1" height="1" />
<p>&nbsp;</p>

		</center>
	<p class="email-footer" align="center" style="color: #333333; font-size: 10px">Not sure if your firm subscribes? Ask your librarian.<br /><br/>We hope you found this message to be useful. <br/>However, if you'd rather not receive future emails of this sort, <br/>you may unsubscribe <a href="https://www.law360.com/unsubscribe?k=0418e859-ed1f-40ac-9fca-fb4ddee2a32d">here</a>.<br/><br/>Please DO NOT reply to this email. For customer support inquiries, please call 1-646-783-7100 or visit our <a href="https://www.law360.com/about/contact">Contact Us</a> page.<br/><br/>Law360 | Portfolio Media, Inc, 111 West 19th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10011</p>
<img src="http://mailings-q.law360.com/wf/open?upn=95ipHO-2FHtfiEGxEkeDVC7qDNnXaveBL1X9i7ezH5gql53S5EVnVQ2URyrlBbg1-2FBvWOryogGBWJoye1A7wRH4PQ09e095D2UrJJ9VqS3vD1ZFUiF0ja-2Fc8TUiPJXNRdNfeFqe1J2DIUtwbfV1vVYELnlcuZ8YxAR4vbRBO03sXk0TZIjEKBV4zi1wRWDfx3hd5pAb3tYJd-2BzXKj5E1SDIyBgcmgDhMwFAGY5DzsGa78-3D" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="height:1px !important;width:1px !important;border-width:0 !important;margin-top:0 !important;margin-bottom:0 !important;margin-right:0 !important;margin-left:0 !important;padding-top:0 !important;padding-bottom:0 !important;padding-right:0 !important;padding-left:0 !important;"/>
</body>
</html>

