Return-Path: Received: from vps.transocean.com by vps.transocean.com with LMTP id CFWPMVYUWVoLZAAAInt2oQ ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:02:30 -0800 Return-path: Envelope-to: bruce@transocean.com Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:02:30 -0800 Received: from o4.mailings-q.law360.com ([167.89.1.233]:6697) by vps.transocean.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ea5Ww-0006gg-RJ for bruce@transocean.com; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:02:30 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=law360.com; h=from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=s1; bh=G+gsOmiuft/09fJi1yShIEz79CA=; b=Dfv1LlkdSnrOsgd2u3Zt87I yADISjtr3utCx7ssxWoYzql2yyp5gX4vyM5CilFb1d2tbDRamueKI4fTMcSTJX48 ecnvlruSoJYgtLqmsxaK/Jx83Po3kwhlUCiDuE3GjwkiSO1BPNvBabSsbVWQx7Zr xduQtBtSFTm7Rg7jr6pw= Received: by filter0107p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0107p1iad2-4777-5A591423-2F 2018-01-12 20:01:40.027829836 +0000 UTC Received: from www.law360.com (ec2-52-23-238-65.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.23.238.65]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id XbnCPIXcTyyvTBU-bnA8CQ for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:01:39.910 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 20:01:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Tax Law360 To: bruce@transocean.com Message-ID: <5a591423ceac0_50752ae30800af582393d3@ip-172-30-200-31.mail> Subject: BREAKING: High Court To Consider Reach Of Internet Retail Taxes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SG-EID: Opio7iv9VGQ4tDJiJszIh3zd7qYkeM6M7FLocQY/BAWkgyrzddoH2MLhWsdn3cb74XOKNCqNjbB8Jn l/Y4CJuFtoqXNHu00NYv2mnVe62LT2gGofVIWNHUcOyiybQb7XxQR9QnewThQbShpFQYrvVidAlwkS bJqEBZo6TguJC9f7GRGLMxDXU/7EJoT2DZR78Qk73T6idtXZHwpd0swYUg== X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 X-Spam-Score: 16 X-Spam-Bar: + X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps.transocean.com", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: The U.S Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear South Dakota’s challenge to Quill v. North Dakota, setting the stage for the high court to decide whether states may compel retailers that do not have a physical presence within their borders to collect and remit use tax. TAX [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: law360.com] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4989] 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Flag: NO

The U.S Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear South Dakota=E2=80=99s cha= llenge to Quill v. North Dakota, setting the stage for the high court to de= cide whether states may compel retailers that do not have a physical presen= ce within their borders to collect and remit use tax.

Friday, January 12, 2018

BREAKING: High= Court To Consider Reach Of Internet Retail Taxes

The U.S Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear South Dakota’= ;s challenge to Quill v. North Dakota, setting the stage for the high court= to decide whether states may compel retailers that do not have a physical = presence within their borders to collect and remit use tax.

LAW FIRMS

COMPANIES

GOVERNMENT = AGENCIES

U.S. Supreme Court